News

On a quiet morning, thousands of Indian tech professionals woke up to a headline that felt like a punch to the gut: the US government had imposed a $100,000 annual fee on H-1B visa holders. No warning. No grace period. There was only a one-day window to re-enter the country before the fee took effect. This situation shook the entire job seekers from India. For many, the American Dream didn’t just dim — it slammed shut. President Donald Trump is continuously taking bigger steps against India, only to sour the relationship. The President is ensuring the benefit of the USA, its GDP, and its businesses. Being self-centred is perfectly fine because, in politics, everyone sees their country’s interests. Ironically, when other countries see their benefits, Trump becomes nervous. President Trump is imposing new ‘Sanctions’ against India that include 50% tariffs. It has been a history of the USA to support Pakistan, and now, the new rule, the ‘H1B visa’. Please read articles on what a tariff war is and its effects, below- Initially, it appears to be a slam on India, but the USA may eventually put itself in trouble. Let’s examine why the USA will also face a massive hit. One thing shines brightly now – Double Standards of the World’s Biggest Economy – PolyBlogger.com The new H-1B visa policy isn’t just a policy change. It’s a tremor-like shift in how talent flows across borders, how they drive innovation, and how they capitalize on their dreams. For Indian Aspirants: A Dream Deferred For decades, the H-1B visa has been a lifeline for Indian engineers, designers, data scientists, researchers, and other professionals seeking employment opportunities in the United States. That doesn’t mean the opportunities aren’t available in India at all. Still, India experiences a brain drain for several reasons. The article below provides an overview of the reasons behind brain drain. 🚀 Brain Drain in India: Why Bright Minds Leave and What It Says About Indians – PolyBlogger.com It’s been the bridge between – But with the new fee of $100,000 (Nearly Rs. 90,00,000 or Rs. 9 million), that bridge now has a toll booth that few can afford to cross. This is the fee that either the individual or their company must pay. It’s hard for an employee to bear this cost. Even if companies are paying this high fee, they must pay for other expenses as well, like air travel tickets, accommodation if any (temporary or permanent), wages, perks, incentives, other employee benefit programs such as meals, outings, dinner/lunch, weekly lunch, annual day programs, etc. The expenses are too high for any company, even if it can afford them. Who is hit the hardest by this decision? Early-career professionals are the hardest hit. Fresh graduates from Indian universities, even with stellar resumes, now face a financial barrier that makes US jobs nearly inaccessible. Many H-1B visa holders who travelled to India for weddings, funerals, or festivals now scramble to return before the fee activates — or risk losing their jobs. Mental health toll is real. The uncertainty, the suddenness, and the sheer cost have left many feeling stranded, anxious, and betrayed by a system immigrants trusted. Now the world wonders whether the USA is still a reliable partner. The H-1B visa rules aren’t just about money. It’s about dignity, stability, and the emotional cost of being treated as a transactional asset. For the US Government: An opportunity for increased native jobs and retain money With a very high debt on its head and widespread public anger about jobs going to foreigners, the USA had to make some decisions, whether necessary or not. Regardless of what different countries think about him, his country is his priority. He aims to curb the outflow of money through various measures, including tariffs on foreign goods, restrictions on hiring foreign employees, and increased sales of defense equipment. What he is probably ignoring is – The President is forcing the world to undergo a transition that may be worst for the USA but is best for the world. Donald Trump is preparing for a US economic funeral, unknowingly. Trump is doing all of these because Russia is at war with Ukraine, and China is now an economic and manufacturing global power, and the USA want to control it. India is rising and fulfilling its oil needs from Russia, as well as its defense needs from Europe, particularly from France and Germany. Trump is probably upset because India is not buying defense equipment from the USA. India is clear in its requirement. It requires technology transfer, localized production, or the integration of local components, or a combination of these approaches. It entirely depends on the defense ministry’s plan. Additionally, India requires cost-effective and beneficial equipment that offers long-term benefits, along with minimal maintenance costs and lower operational expenses. America may not fit in all or some of these criteria. So, India is not purchasing it. For US Companies: Innovation Under Siege The fee isn’t just a burden on individuals — it’s a toll tax on innovation. For India: A Strategic Crossroads India stands at a crossroads. It entirely depends on how India perceives it: as a challenge and an opportunity or a punishment. India must now decide: does it fight for access to the US, or build a future where it no longer needs it? However, it is also true that the Trump administration will not last long. With the new government, there are hopes for improving bilateral trade negotiations. It is also true that in Politics, no one is a permanent enemy or a permanent friend; it is all about selfish motives. Niche Effects: The Quiet Collateral Damage Beyond headlines and boardrooms, the fee hike has subtle, far-reaching, and heavy consequences. These effects won’t show up in GDP charts, as they are not measurable unless studied in depth—but they’ll shape lives, families, and futures. The Bigger Picture: What Kind of country does America want to be? At its core, this policy forces a

History often reminds us that arrogance, when fueled by misplaced false pride and false denial, leads nations down the paths of self-destruction. Pakistan is a stark example in this regard. For decades, it has allowed terrorism to take root in its soil. It nurtured groups with violent ideologies and used them as instruments of state policy against India. The irony is that the Pakistan declares itself on global platforms like the UN, IMF, World Bank, or SAARC that it is “a victim of terrorism”. It sounds less like truth and more like a thief standing in court claiming ignorance of theft. The world knows Pakistan has harbored, funded, and exported terror for decades. Its victimhood narrative is nothing more than an attempt to escape accountability. Every time these very choices have backfired Pakistan. It left on Pakistan politically isolated, economically tumbled, vulnerable to its own defense, and morally questioned. Please read my blogs on this topic to understand how and why terrorism cannot exist without the support of governments and locals.  Moreover, while the operation Sindoor went on, India exposed that Pakistani military officials were standing together with terrorists for the funerals of the family members of the terrorists and other killed terrorists. That means they don’t just support terrorists, but they are terrorists. Operation Sindoor, India’s latest response to terrorism, is a continuation of this long struggle—a war temporarily paused, not concluded. Operation Sindoor The Recent Pahalgam Attack Unlike earlier times, however, India’s response was swift and precise. Intelligence-based operations neutralized several militant hideouts. Cross-border communication channels buzzed with warnings to Pakistan, and the Indian Army pushed forward under Operation Sindoor—a symbol of resilience and sacrifice painted red by the blood of martyrs. India’s Retaliation and Pakistan’s Losses Every time Pakistan exports terror, it imports instability. India’s operations for justice not only inflict military damage but also erode Pakistan’s already fragile economy. Pakistanis have to divert billions of dollars to just restoring the military facilities. International investors run away from a nation associated with terrorism. The soaring inflation, joblessness, low business activity, and IMF’s bailouts have led to widespread disappointment among ordinary citizens. Yet, despite these losses, Pakistan clings to arrogance. Its leaders deliver fiery speeches that soothe its civilians with joy, untruthfully deny their role in terrorism, and propagate victimhood narratives at global forums. The irony remains: while accusing India of aggression, Pakistan bleeds internally due to the monsters and snakes it created. India’s Measures to Crush Arrogance India has gradually built a multi-layered strategy to counter Pakistan’s hostility: Operation Sindoor paused, not stopped India’s attitude has changed from defensive to offensive. The nation demands justice for every attack, misbehavior and threat. While the war may seem paused under Operation Sindoor, the silence is tactical, not permanent. It was Pakistan who demanded a ceasefire, not India. India knows that half-measures no longer suffice. The final step, when taken, would likely be a decisive dismantling of terror infrastructure across the border and within the country—a move not just to punish perpetrators but to end the cycle of nuclear blackmail once and for all. Hopefully, massive destruction, heavy losses and damages would wake Pakistan up to stop terrorism. However, the entire of India believes that Pakistan will never improve. It will destroy itself, yet it will never understand. Whether through covert missions, precision strikes, full-blown wars, or diplomatic maneuvers that corner Pakistan into irrelevance, India’s intent is becoming clearer: no compromise with terrorism, no tolerance for double standards. Operation Sindoor is paused, not stopped. The history of Pakistan is terrorism Pakistan’s Long Romance with Terrorism, and the hunt down of Osama bin Laden, a mastermind behind the 9/11 terror attack in the USA Pakistan came into existence in 1947 based on religious ideology. Since then, it has become the hub of radical groups. First, during the Afghan-Soviet war and later through its calculated strategy of “bleeding India through a million cuts.” Pakistan’s intelligence wing, the ISI sheltered organizations like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Hizbul Mujahideen, trained and armed under the patronage of. Their missions were clear: destabilize Kashmir, spread fear in Indian cities, and weaken the democratic fabric of India. Please read my blogs on – The world realized (but doesn’t want to recognized) that Pakistan was not merely incompetent in controlling terrorists; it was complicit. Billions of dollars in aid had flowed into Islamabad for counterterrorism. But the very architect of the deadliest terror attack on American soil lived comfortably under its nose. Two and a half Decades of Terror Attacks The 1990 to 2014 era has seen India pay a heavy price for Pakistan’s reckless policies. Each attack deepened scars but also hardened India’s resolve. Surgical strikes, the Balakot airstrike, and a more assertive counterterrorism doctrine showed that the patience of the past no longer bound India. Conclusion “Operation Sindoor” is not merely a military campaign; it reflects India’s patience, pain, and persistence. The war against terrorism is not just about defending borders—but it is about protecting the idea of India itself, where democracy, pluralism, and peace take precedence over hate. For Pakistan, the pause in battle is an opportunity—an invitation to introspect and abandon its obsession with hostility. But history suggests that arrogance rarely allows wisdom to bloom. If Pakistan continues down the same road, India’s final step may not just pause the war—it may end it in a manner that rewrites South Asia’s, especially Pakistan’s destiny.

The game of fall of Nepal began in 2008 when the 240-year Monarchy rule ended and Nepal lost the status of ‘The Last Hindu Kingdom’ to the so-called ‘Secular Democratic Republic’. Everyone believes that China was behind this movement. China likely sought to end the Monarchy rule and annex Nepal as part of its territory expansion policy. Since 1998, the Maoist rebel group led by Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachand) has been waging a rebellion in Nepal. The aim was to end the Hindu kingdom and establish a constitution-based secular democracy so that countries like Pakistan, China, and the USA can enter the regional politics of Nepal. A decade-long rebellion ended when the last Monarch, Gyanendra Shah, stepped down from the status of ‘Crown of Nepal’. The Monarcy was believed to be the ‘avatar’ of lord Vishnu. But the diluted polity elected the Communist Party as the future of Nepal. Since then, Nepal has never settled on peace. In 17 years, Nepal has seen 13 prime ministers, which clearly indicates the continuous political upheaval driven by hidden agendas and selfishness. We will examine whose agenda is driving the instability in Nepal and who is behind it. CPN UML leader KP Sharma Oli assumed the office as Prime Minister in 2015 and held the position for nearly a year. Before his tenure as PM, he was deputy PM from 20026 to 2007 and external affairs minister in 2013. UML is the Unified Marxists-Leninist Party.   Oli became PM of Nepal thrice – Ex-PM Oli attempted to control the Gen-Z and the mob. His government even ordered Before his tenure as a PM, a Royal family was ruling the nation. His Photos are placed in prominent places in the Pashupati Nath Temple. The Lord Shiva temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site known as ‘Pashupati Nath’, is a world-famous destination, attracting millions of visitors every year. Until the nation became predominantly Hindu and had monarchical rule, Nepal remained peaceful. We need not be highly educated to understand that wherever Pakistani, Maoists, Communists, or Chinese enter any region, that region becomes unstable. Even though there is a specific ‘peaceful community’ that rapidly increases its population and then captures the region, forcing others to convert or flee. You can watch YouTube to know more about this ‘Peaceful community’ that starts silently, only to become violent. There is no difference in the opinion that such rebels are destabilizing the country. But who funds them? What is the motive behind it? Let’s dive into it to see the reality. 2019 was the year that sparked volcanic turbulence in a chain of political, social, and generational upheavals. It was then that Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli unnecessarily deepened ties with China. This movement of Oli turned his era towards downfall, though prima facie it looked like a strategic bold move to align itself with China. The China Overture (2019) In 2019, KP Oli hosted high-level meetings with Beijing, presenting Nepal as a willing partner in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This move was completely unnecessary. Because Nepal shares the maximum border with India and the northern border with China, which is also a part of the Himalayan mountain range. The BRI had no meaning since India was not part of it. The BRI would have entered Nepal from China and would have re-entered China because there is no way out. Why would anyone take a longer road only to benefit another country? The real motive was to capture Nepal, either entirely or in parts. But Oli never understood it because China had probably deepened his pockets. The optics were grand—smiling leaders, signed agreements, promises of infrastructure, and dreams of a “new Nepal.” But behind the handshakes, many Nepalis saw something more troubling: a subtle but undeniable tilt away from India, the country’s largest neighbour and historical ally. The question is how suddenly everything changed after the visit of the Chinese representative to Nepal? After that, the Galwan Valley standoff and clash with Chinese soldiers incident happened. A Crystal-Clear Picture in the Minds of Nepalis about India Nepalese understood that everything comes from India, including electricity, crude oil, trade routes by Sea to the skies for travel, railways to road infrastructures, medicines to food, visa-free entry, monetary packages, perks, defense security, and jobs in defense, among many other benefits. In that year, Oli made vague and rogue comments about the Limpiyadhura–Lipulekh–Kalapani area (popularly known as “Limpu Lake”), claiming the territory as its own. The pomposity played well with nationalists, but the relationship with India soured. There was a need for routine diplomatic dialogues between India and Nepal, but Oli’s comments led to a ground-level standoff. Nepal also tries to infiltrate, claiming the sovereign territory of India as its territory. But our soldiers stood eye to eye and threw them back. Words That Divided a Neighbourhood Following Limpu Lake, a stream of barbed comments from Oli’s administration targeted India, encompassing trade, security, and culture. Oli appeared intent on portraying India as the perpetual villain. To many Nepalis, this looked like political theatre—a way to distract from his own government’s failings. Many experts worldwide have advised Nepal to align with India rather than China. But Oli never listened. By 2020 and 2021, Nepal was reeling from COVID-19 mismanagement, a crumbling economy, and joblessness. Oli’s anti-India rhetoric grew harsher just as his domestic failures multiplied. For every failure or internal problem, he followed one pattern: ‘To Blame India’. And India always remained silent, just like a big brother, because it knew who the driving force was. India only waited for the regime change so that it would improve the ties and eliminate the damage. Corruption, Nepotism, and the Passport Scandal While Oli projected himself as a nationalist fighting for Nepal’s sovereignty, corruption scandals only eroded his credibility. Nepalis soon realized the true nature of Oli. The revelation of nepotism and corruption enraged the civilians, especially Gen Z, who were struggling for income sources and government officials and ministers’ kids were enjoying

The world is undergoing significant changes due to economic rivalries and shifting alliances. Especially amid the current tariff war opened by the USA president, Mr. Donald Trump, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit 2025, held in Tianjin, China, emerged as a powerful symbol of multilateral cooperation and strategic recalibration and re-alliances. Against the backdrop of Donald Trump’s renewed tariff war, the summit brought together leaders from across Eurasia, South Asia, and beyond to chart a collective path forward. Although not all summit details are public, discussions about the tariff war may have taken place. For those who are a little aware of what a tariff war is, please read my blogs – These blogs will provide insight into what a tariff war is and its impact on America and the world. The whole world is watching the significance of the SCO-2025 summit and the development it will bring. With the context of a bigger event, let’s dive into the news related to the SCO. What is the SCO? The Shanghai Cooperation Organization is a regional intergovernmental body founded in 2001 originally by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Over the years, it has expanded to include India, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus as full members, with several other nations participating as observers or dialogue partners. SCO is a non-Western nation organization. You will find the complete list of participating and contributing countries to the SCO in the blog below. Its core mission revolves around: While the objectives of SCO are clear on paper, the question remains whether they are truly fulfilling them, mainly the aim of combating terrorism, separatism and extremism. Pakistan is a terrorist country and is a part of the SCO. This country is a puppet of the USA, and so the confidentiality of the developments of the SCO, before it takes final shape, is hard to believe.    Nonetheless, the organization appears powerful, considering the information below and the countries involved. The SCO represents nearly 43% of the world’s population and over 23% of global GDP, making it one of the most influential regional blocs globally. Why Is the SCO Important? In an era of fragmented global governance, the SCO offers: Its emphasis on the “Shanghai Spirit”—mutual trust, equality, respect for diversity, and shared development—sets it apart from traditional power blocs. Below are essential points on the importance of the SCO. SCO 2025: Significance Amid Trump’s Tariff War The 2025 summit was particularly significant due to escalating tensions triggered by Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff policies. His unusual behaviour and pressure on countries have not only sparked widespread rage against him but also provided an opportunity for countries to unite that might not have otherwise occurred. The President of the USA is allying with nations to counter the United States itself. It has also given opportunities to the meme makers, comedians, and the opposition party of America. To add to that, the President’s cabinet ministry is making such weird comments to fuel the rage against America. One of the crackpots said that the ‘Brahmins are making huge money by reselling Russian oil’. ‘Brahmin’ is a caste in the Hindu community in India. Is it safe to guess that the American government is now taking every cheap step to demean India and the partner countries? What the President has imposed is – These moves have disrupted global trade flows and pushed SCO nations to strengthen intra-bloc cooperation. The summit served as a unified response to economic bullying, with leaders calling for: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Russian President Vladimir Putin stood together to signal solidarity against external pressure. The trio made such a posture that anyone might think something must be cooking against the United States of America. We may not see the results immediately, but they may become apparent in the coming years. This SCO was important for India because of the recent attack by Pakistani Terrorists in ‘Pahalgam’ in the J&K region of India. Participating Countries in SCO 2025 This year’s SCO 2025 summit saw participation from: This made it the largest SCO summit in history, with over 20 heads of state and 10 international organizations represented. Key Agenda of SCO 2025 The summit revolved around the theme: “Upholding the Shanghai Spirit: SCO on the Move” SCO members discussed and agreed on the following main topics: This SCO bank may also enhance international payments, trade trust, and financial cooperation. India proposed a Civilizational Dialogue Forum to foster cultural ties and mutual understanding. Outcomes and Benefits for Member States The summit yielded several tangible benefits: For India, the summit was a strategic win—diversifying trade, countering Western pressure, and reaffirming its role as a regional leader. For the US, it was a dream fading away. Mr. Donald Trump wanted India and other countries to keep away from Russia; however, the relations with Russia only strengthened. The Indo-Russian energy and defence ties deepen, ignoring the Trump administration. China took the opportunity of Trump’s tariff war to improve relations with neighbours like India. Both agreed to open the trade routes and direct transportation. Also, China resolved most of the border tensions with India strategically, before the SCO summit. On the contrary, President Donald Trump’s tariff strategy loosens the grip in South Asia. The world has now started ignoring Mr. Donald Trump, hasn’t it? Conclusion The SCO Summit 2025 was more than a diplomatic gathering—it was a statement of intent. As the world grapples with protectionism and geopolitical fragmentation, the SCO stands as a beacon of cooperation, resilience, and shared progress. The world will experience the shifting economic powers, new strategies, and the emergence of nations beyond the Western world. This summit will definitely bring some breaking news in future. In the face of Trump’s tariff war, the summit sent a clear message: Unity among emerging powers can reshape the global order.

President Donald J. Trump’s strict and stringent tariff strategy—targeting not only rivals like China and Russia but also long-standing partners such as India—has caused significant economic disruption. The result? A noticeable rise in consumer prices across the United States is affecting households and businesses alike. Initially promoted as a move to protect American manufacturing, the policy now faces criticism for potentially harming the very economy it aimed to strengthen. Labeling major global economies like Russia and India as “dead” may prove counterproductive. Together with China, these three nations account for nearly 45% of global trade. India, in particular, is currently the world’s fastest-growing economy, with its August 2025 growth rate reaching 7.8%, which is well above projections. Please read my blog on the following topics to gain a better understanding of the background behind this blog. Let’s examine how the American economy is responding—and whether the president’s approach is truly helping. Tariff Rates and Their Reach From smartphone components to pharmaceuticals, textiles to auto parts, tariffs ranging from 10% to over 200% have been imposed on imports from multiple countries. These sweeping measures have placed pressure on American supply chains and consumer budgets. The more strained America’s international relationships become, the more tariffs are introduced. Questioning the Rationale Country’s Buying Russian Oil/products One justification for tariffs has been India’s purchase of Russian oil. The US administration suggests this indirectly supports the Russia–Ukraine conflict. But if that logic holds, then Western nations supplying weapons and financial aid to Ukraine must also acknowledge their role in prolonging the war directly. The geopolitical tension between Russia and NATO has existed for decades. Some nations aim to isolate Russia, others seek to weaken its economy, and some profit from arms sales. The US appears to pursue all three. Countries that diverge from this stance often face penalties, such as tariffs or sanctions. Meanwhile, European nations continue to import Russian energy to manage their own crises. Will the US impose similar tariffs on them? Domestic Manufacturing: A Long Road Ahead If the American government’s goal is to produce everything domestically, that is hardly possible in the short run. Building a robust manufacturing base requires: Many essential resources, such as rare earth metals and semiconductors, are not readily available in the US. Without them, inflation is likely to rise. And once prices increase, they rarely return to previous levels. The “Great Again” Question President Trump’s slogan, “Make America Great Again,” implies that America has lost its edge. But globally, the US is viewed as a leading power. Perhaps the real aim of the president is to reduce the national debt, which currently stands at $37 trillion—more than the total economic output of many nations over the past century. If these tariffs are meant to curb spending and boost domestic consumption, Americans must ask: at what cost? Underlying Motives Higher Debt Affecting world’s economies on large scale. Strategic or Self-Serving? Tariffs can destabilize foreign markets. When exports drop, job losses and economic anxiety follow. This scenario often leads to stock market dips—potentially creating buying opportunities for American investors. Could this be a calculated move to benefit American investors or allied nations? If so, it raises ethical questions about market manipulation. Investment Flow and Inflation While tariffs may attract foreign investment through higher interest rates on US treasuries, they also increase debt servicing costs. Inflation is already squeezing American consumers, and domestic investors have fewer opportunities to grow their wealth. Exporters from countries such as India are shifting their focus toward Europe and the Middle East, seeking more stable trade relationships. This shift disrupts supply chains and contributes to rising prices in the US. Healthcare, for example, is feeling the strain. “We used to sell affordable generic medicines to hospitals. Now, with the import duty spike, prices have nearly doubled. Patients are suffering,” says Dr. Martha Collins, a procurement head in Texas. However, when inflation rises, the government may have to increase the interest rates on treasuries and deposits to control inflation. Investors worldwide may invest in the USA’s treasuries due to higher interest rates, resulting in a higher investment flow. However, the catch is that this also increases the debt burden as well as the interest cost. Already, the debt owed by Americans is as high as $37 trillion. How is this beneficial for Americans? Is “Make America Great Again” really working? Will this tariff war truly accelerate US manufacturing? It’s unlikely, given the higher costs of labour, materials, and production. When all six M’s—Men, Money, Material, Method, Machinery, and Marketing—become more expensive, competitiveness suffers. Instead of boosting industry, the policy may be fueling global resentment toward the US. Inflation has surged from 3% to nearly 10% in just three months and may continue to rise. Experts warn that growth could slow further if current strategies persist. Conclusion The primary reason for tariffs on India is its oil trade with Russia. But if that’s considered war-fueling, what about direct arms support from the US and EU to Ukraine? Or their own energy deals with Russia? The American government must grow out of the mindset that, if it is you (USA), it is allowed, but if it is any other country, it is entirely not allowed. The president of the USA must acknowledge that every country has the right to put its nation’s interest first, as the US is trying to do. Is President Trump truly making America great again? Until this tariff war ends, global economic uncertainty will continue—and may escalate. Please don’t forget to comment your views or suggestions in the comment box below.