September 4, 2024

It is widely recognized that Pakistan is a nation associated with terrorism, extremism, and sexual violence. The only difference is that most countries remain silent, with only a few willing to speak out. Silence can be a powerful weapon, often politically motivated. However, when we do not break silence when needed, it can have devastating consequences, akin to a nuclear attack. Unfortunately, the world often realizes this only after a tragic event has occurred, which can be far too late to take action. I urge everyone to understand the reality of Pakistan before it is too late. It is a ticking time bomb that could explode anywhere in the world at any moment. You may wonder why I make such a bold statement. Let’s explore the reasons why Pakistan is a land of terror, extremism, radicalization, bigotry, and sexual violence. 1) The Existence of Pakistan The very existence of Pakistan underscores its radical nature. Following the end of British rule, many extremists and separatists migrated to Pakistan just around India gained independence on August 15, 1947. Barrister Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan and a former leader of the Muslim League, approached Lord Mountbatten, the Viceroy and Governor-General of India at the time, to advocate for a separate nation based on the Islamic faith. Jinnah was the only prominent figure pushing for this division; he played the religious and victimization cards to garner support. Please also read my blog ‘Pakistan’s current and historical views on Women – PolyBlogger.com’, to know more about events that occurred during partitions. His ultimate goal was to become the first Prime Minister of India, but he recognized that this was unattainable. Thus, he demanded the partition of a united India. Mountbatten and the British royal family were keen to keep India unstable and embroiled in conflict, which would hinder its development. They welcomed Jinnah’s radical demands. Jinnah incited Muslims across India, leading to strikes and riots throughout the country. Prominent leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and even Mahatma Gandhi opposed the partition. However, their efforts to prevent it were in vain. Ultimately, Nehru, who also aspired to be the first Prime Minister of independent India, approved the partition. In essence, even before its formation, the roots of the foundation of Pakistan were in radicalization and extremism. It emerged as a fundamentally bigoted and extremist nation. 2)  The Partition Timeline India gained independence on August 15, 1947. Jinnah sought an earlier independence date, but that was not feasible. Instead, he chose to declare Pakistan’s independence a day earlier, on August 14, 1947. He intended to demonstrate to the world that Pakistan achieved independence before India, positioning India as secondary to Pakistan. By the time of independence, no countries had the boundaries clear and final. The entire nation was aware that there would be a partition, with Muslims moving to Pakistan and Hindus to India. However, Mahatma Gandhi stated that any Muslim who wished to remain in India can stay back. In contrast, Jinnah’s supporters insisted that Pakistan should be exclusively for Muslims, leading to a rise in extremism. On August 14, 1947, a train departed from Peshawar, Pakistan, heading to Delhi, India. The radical individuals, predominantly radical Muslims attacked the train. Almost all Hindu and Sikh passengers were killed, and the women on board were subjected to horrific violence, with many raped multiple times. When the train finally reached Delhi, it was full with the bodies of adults and children. The scenes were gruesome, with dismembered bodies and women left naked. This event marked a severe escalation of hatred against Hindus and Sikhs, transforming former neighbours into enemies overnight. This extreme mindset also took root in India. A train leaving Delhi and stopping in Punjab was attacked by Sikhs, resulting in four deaths and numerous violent confrontations. In response to these events, Pakistan became even more radicalized, committing to the mission of killing Sikhs and Hindus at any cost. Another train departed from Lahore, Pakistan, to Ludhiana, Indian Punjab, on August 15, 1947, filled with the bodies of men, women, and children. Many women were gang-raped by groups of eight to ten men before being sent to India. This train bore a message that read, “Nehru and Patel ko Azadi ka tohfa” (a gift of independence for Nehru and Patel). Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel found themselves in a dilemma, torn between celebrating independence after 200 years of colonial rule and addressing the horrific situation unfolding around them. In the aftermath of these incidents, numerous riots erupted between Hindus and Muslims in India. Over 2 million people lost their lives, and countless rapes occured and history has documented it now. The situation in Pakistan was similarly dire, but the number of victims remains unknown due to the suppression of data. Nearly 14 million people were displaced as a result of Jinnah’s demands. Such horrific Jinnah was. This is how Pakistan began its descent into extremism, radicalism, and bigotry, becoming associated with acts of violence and sexual assault. One might question how India differs if similar actions occurred there. It is crucial to remember who initiated the violence, who sought partition based on religious grounds, and who aimed to expel all Hindus from the region. Attacks made in self-defence are not the same as unprovoked aggression. As you continue reading this blog, you will understand why Pakistan is labelled as extremist and radical, while India is not. 3) Radicalism and Extremism As previously mentioned, the existence of Pakistan is rooted in radical thinking and Islam religion. Not all Islamic people are radical however, the majority of Pakistanis are radical. We have already discussed the pre- and post-partition movements in Pakistan. Now, let’s delve into the next chapter. Kashmir was a princely state ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh, who faced the choice of joining either India or Pakistan. While he deliberated, the Pakistani army feared he would align with India. To prevent this, they sent local Islamic tribal groups, known as “Kabaylis” (singular: Kabayli) and

The assertion that ” Pakistan’s current and historical views on Women are not good at all”, is a significant claim. However, there is substantial evidence to support this statement. The internet is filled with documentation, I do not need to bear this responsibility alone. Let’s explore why this perspective exists. In the history, Pakistan was divided into East and West Pakistan, the situation in East Pakistan was dire. The people there suffered greatly, while those in West Pakistan largely remained silent. This silence could imply either complicity or fear of the military regime. But why did they suffer? Let’s learn in the below sections. Please also read my blog on Pakistan’s radicalism, extremism and violence in ‘Pakistan: A Land Extremism, Radicalism, and Violence – PolyBlogger.com. Please like, comment and share this blog as well. I firmly believe that many in West Pakistan tacitly supported the actions of the Pakistani army in Eastern Pakistan. It is hard to comprehend how such atrocities could occur right before people’s eyes without any significant protests. The absence of any notable dissent is indeed troubling. To illustrate this headline topic, we will examine two significant historical events: Partition and the Liberation of Bangladesh. History tends to repeat itself, and we cannot predict which nation might face similar challenges in the future. While neighbouring countries have grown stronger and are now capable of countering Pakistan, we cannot be certain where Pakistan might strike next or what brutal actions it may undertake. Trusting in Pakistan is akin to placing faith in malevolence while shutting out the possibility of goodness. 1) Partition India received independence on 15th Aug 1947 and Pakistan on 14th Aug 1947. It wasn’t a joyful ride to get independence. Based on various discussions, riots and talk shows; it was clear to have a new country. Jinnah won this battle and since then the emergence of a radical state began. When India chose 15th Aug 1947 as the day of independence, Jinnah selected a day prior as Pakistan’s Independence Day. But even after independence, the borders of both countries were unclear. The next chaos started around Independence Day. Since the borders were unclear, people started moving to their desired country by leaving their lands and houses as is, in panic. That’s where radical people began to play. 2) Liberation of Bangladesh Following independence, Pakistan was divided into East and West Pakistan. East Pakistan, now known as Bangladesh, was located to the east of India, while West Pakistan was situated to the west. For further information, you can find various videos on YouTube by searching for terms like “Bangladesh genocide and rapes” or “India-Pakistan war 1971.” These resources will provide additional context to my claims. Bangladesh has always been a majority Bangla-speaking country. However, Ali Jinnah designated Urdu as the official language of Pakistan. In East Pakistan, where Bangla was predominantly spoken, politicians banned the language from official assemblies, humiliating Bangla speakers. Jinnah declared that anyone speaking languages other than Urdu, such as Hindi or Bangla, was an enemy of Islam and Pakistan. This rhetoric fuelled existing radicalism and bigotry, spreading hatred throughout the region. By 1958, the situation was still manageable, but everything changed when the government was overthrown, leading to military rule in Pakistan. Ayub Khan, the army commander-in-chief, assumed the presidency. The cruelty faced by the people of Bangladesh escalated. They were treated as second-class citizens, especially since over 30% of the population was Hindu, while the majority spoke Bangla. One notable figure who opposed the government was Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. He united the people of East Pakistan, leading protests against Ayub Khan’s regime. Rahman was imprisoned multiple times for his activism. By 1970, the pressure on Ayub Khan became unbearable, forcing him to resign. The demand for general elections was met, and the nation was shocked when the results were announced. Mujibur Rahman, leader of the Muslim Awami League, won a decisive majority. Ideally, he should have become the next Prime Minister of Pakistan. However, the West Pakistanis could not accept this outcome, and that is where the turmoil truly began. The Pakistani army undertook a series of alarming actions aimed at East Pakistan during this tumultuous period: Despite the widespread knowledge of these atrocities, including among Western countries like the USA, as well as nations in Europe, Asia, and Australia, there was a shocking lack of intervention. It remains unclear whether this inaction stemmed from fear, a desire to avoid conflict, or a strategic interest in maintaining instability in the Indian subcontinent. Let’s see below, what happened next. 3) The Western World’s Double Standard During this tumultuous period, Mrs. Indira Gandhi served as the Prime Minister of India, and the war narrative began to unfold. It was only after this liberation that the widespread rapes ceased. In response to India’s treaty with Russia, Western countries, particularly the USA and UK, attempted to support Pakistan. This marked the beginning of a close friendship between Russia and India, which the USA and UK could not influence. They supported a radical and extremist regime in Pakistan, driven by the selfish motive of undermining Indo-Russian relations. Throughout this period, India maintained a neutral stance regarding the Cold War and did not comment on it. The treaty with Russia has been under review since 1969, and I believe the USA and UK misunderstood its significance. 4) The Halala Ritual This topic may shock you and leave you momentarily breathless. In any relationship, couples often have disagreements. I believe that without some conflict, a couple’s life can become monotonous. However, after a disagreement, a wife might offer something to eat or drink, leading to reconciliation. They apologize to each other, and resolve the issue, only to prepare for the next disagreement. This “Tom and Jerry” dynamic continues throughout their lives. In Pakistan, the situation is different. When a couple fights, they may resort to verbal divorce. This is nothing but a “Triple Talak.” If either partner says the word “Talak” three times, the divorce becomes official.